sure win ph Vloggers question House ‘fake news’ probe at SC

sure win ph

HOT CONTENT Tuesday’s House hearing on the spread of misinformation on social media attracts unusual on-site coverage—from social media content creators. —Niño Jesus Orbeta

MANILA, Philippines — A House inquiry into the proliferation of fake news on social media got underway on Tuesday but immediately drew a legal challenge from the very people it had invited as resource persons.

gwd slot

Out of the 40 vloggers, commentators, and influencers invited to the hearing, only three showed up and faced the so-called House tri-committee.

Article continues after this advertisement

Out of the 37 who snubbed the hearing, 13 filed a petition with the Supreme Court on the same day, questioning the probe for being “unconstitutional.”

FEATURED STORIES NEWSINFO PhilHealth chief replaced in wake of ouster calls NEWSINFO SC justice: PhilHealth prioritized investments, not benefits NEWSINFO Car owners may eventually have to pay fees to use Edsa, says Remulla

READ: Vlogger calls out colleagues for not showing up at House hearing

The 13 petitioners, most of them known for being supporters of former President Rodrigo Duterte, asked the high court to put a stop to the inquiry and prevent any similar action by the House that seeks to police social media content.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Show-cause orders issued vs vloggers who skipped tri-comm hearing

Article continues after this advertisement

Named as respondents were Speaker Martin Romualdez, Surigao del Norte Rep. Robert Ace Barbers, and members of the committees on public order and safety, information and communications technology, and public information that now constitute the tri-committee.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Unless restrained, the respondents would proceed with the hearings purportedly in aid of legislation… and are bent on introducing legislation to suppress, stifle, and censor free speech, all in the guise of ‘regulation,’” the petitioners said.

Among the petitioners are former Presidential Communications Office chief Trixie Cruz-Angeles, former anti-insurgency task force spokesperson Lorraine Badoy-Partosa, and vloggers Mark Anthony Lopez, Ernesto Abines Jr., Ethel Pineda Garcia, Krizette Laureta Chu, Jonathan Morales, Aeron Pena, Nelson Guzmanos, Elizabeth Joie Cruz, Suzanne Batalla, Kester John Tan and George Ahmed Paglinawan.

Article continues after this advertisement Barbers’ ‘chilling effect’

Hours before their filing at the high court, they sent letters to the House tri-committee declining the invitation and expressing concerns that the inquiry would infringe on freedom of speech and expression.

Pagasa Weather Division Chief Juanito Galang said the development of super typhoons is more common at the end of the year, thus, they are not ruling out such a possibility for Kristine.

Kristine entered the Philippine area of responsibility on Monday and it is forecast to further intensify into a typhoon.

In a privilege speech on Dec. 4, 2024, Barbers called for an investigation into the spread of what he called harmful online content by “trolls” and “pro-China propagandists.”

Referring to the speech, the petitioners argued that Barbers’ statements—and the ensuing inquiry—would create a “chilling effect” on free speech.

They expressed fears of being forced to attend a hearing where they face harassment, humiliation, or detention if cited in contempt, similar to the fate of some resource speakers in past House inquiries.

In a separate statement, Harry Roque—one of the no-shows in last year’s House hearings and who was later ordered arrested—denounced the latest inquiry as “part of the political witch hunt to silence the Dutertes and their outspoken allies.”

“The real intent is to muzzle the free speech of these modern-day truth-tellers,” said Roque, who was last reported to be overseas.

Show-cause orders

Hours before the filing of the petition, the tri-committee chaired by Laguna Rep. Dan Fernandez issued show-cause orders against Cruz-Angeles, Chu, Lopez, Abines, Pena, as well as other vloggers Elizabeth Joie Cruz, Richard Mata, Suzanne Batalla, and Ethel Pineda, for their nonappearance.

The order was dismissed as “invalid” for the reasons they stated in their letters for snubbing Tuesday’s hearing.

Abang Lingkod Rep. Joseph Stephen Paduano also filed a motion to refer Cruz-Angeles’ absence to the House legal department for a possible disbarment complaint.

“She is an officer of the court… and she should respect the constitutional duty of Congress. I respectfully move that we consult the legal department of this House for a possible disbarment case against Atty. Trixie Angeles,” Paduano said.

Barbers challenged the vloggers to “stop hiding behind” their legal actions.

“’Di ba ang tatapang niyo? (Aren’t you supposed to be fearless?)” he said. “You’re so good at criticizing the government, so bring it up here so that we can craft legislation.’’

“You were invited here to speak your mind. Isn’t that practicing your freedom of expression? Why send excuse letters?” he added.

In defense of the House inquiry, Barbers said it was not intended to curtail free speech but to craft regulations to ensure accountability and ethical use of social media.

Proceed with caution

But other resource speakers at Tuesday’s hearing advised lawmakers to proceed with caution, saying that even the most well-intended policies could be used to suppress lawful dissent and legitimate criticism in a democracy.

It was a common warning issued by University of Massachusetts professor Jonathan Corpus Ong, University of the Philippines associate professor and Tsek.ph coordinator Rachel Khan, and lawyer Michael Tiu.

“Many antifake news laws (in other countries) are often used in an inconsistent and arbitrary fashion, often used by incumbent politicians and governments to target activists, critics, journalists, and opposition parties,” Ong said.

“It would be rubberstamping local overregulation, embolden authoritarian regulators, and incentivize platforms to comply with illegitimate government requests,” he added.

Khan said there “must be an emphasis on media and information literacy by involving various stakeholders, including governments, technology companies, civil society organizations, and the academe in developing and implementing strategies to educate the public.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again. Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

SIGN ME UP

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

But Khan suggested penalizing “mastermindssure win ph, especially black PR firms engaged in disinformation… [T]here has to be a way to penalize them rather than the individual trolls because we would get nowhere doing that.”

READ NEXT SC justice: PhilHealth prioritized investments, not benefits Teachers had to catch up with ‘Catch-Up Fridays’ EDITORS' PICK PMA graduate, Ilocos Norte native is new chief of PDEA DeepSeek: AFP willing to review policies on using Chinese chatbot EDITORIAL: Vax wastage: No end in sight? Marcos holds meeting with MMDA on comprehensive traffic plan Illegal mining allegedly perpetrated by Chinese in Surigao City leaves deep, painful scars Electricity cheaper in cool January MOST READ DILG: Edsa bus lane may be removed, motorcycles to be allowed in bike lanes Car owners may eventually have to pay fees to use Edsa, says Remulla SC justice: PhilHealth prioritized investments, not benefits Chinese-named X accounts spread fake news to defend Dutertes – group Follow @FMangosingINQ on Twitter --> View comments